|
HFT HOME
|
|
Hydro-Flo Technologies, Inc |
|
Products
|
|
Why Choose
Hydro-Flo Technologies |
Request
a Quote |
E-Mail this
page |
E-Mail Us |
|
|
Procedure for the design and sizing of an Inclined Plate Clarifier
(parallel plate, lamella) for the removal of settleable suspended
solids
Table of Contents
-
Inclined Plate Clarifier (parallel plate, lamella) Theory of Operation
-
General Considerations
-
Inclined Plate Clarifier Decision - Flow Diagram
Determining if your process requires a clarifier or
clarification system
-
Inclined Plate Clarifier Design - Flow Diagram
Basic process in the design of an oil water separator or
separation system
-
The Impact of Settling Rate on Inclined Plate Clarifier
Design
-
Sizing the
Clarifier or Clarification System
Inputting the accumulated data to the Hydro-Flo Clarifier Sizing
Spreadsheet to accurately size a clarifier or clarification system for
your application
-
Comparing and Evaluating
Clarifiers and Clarification
Systems from Different Suppliers
Reviewing and filling out the Hydro-Flo Technologies, "Application
Questionnaire" will also help you gather pertinent information
required for the proper design and application of inclined plate
clarifiers and clarification systems.
If you are unfamiliar with basic inclined plate clarifier (plate
settler, parallel plate clarifier, lamella plate settler, etc.) design
principles, a review of the "Inclined
Plate Clarifier (parallel plate, lamella) Theory of Operation" might prove helpful.
This basic document covers Stokes' law and other basic separation
concepts.
Inclined
plate clarifiers are typically considered very simple devices.
However, several factors that could potentially affect safety,
efficiency, and proper management must be given careful
consideration prior to the installation or modification of any
clarifier or clarification system:
-
Flow Rate
In general, clarifiers are sized by the flow rate verses the
separation chambers "effective" surface area (or, as it is more
commonly called. the "projected" surface
area). Therefore, the effectiveness of any clarifier is affected by the flow rate. The slower the
flow, the better the results.
-
Design Capacity
A clarifier has upper limits to the amounts of suspended solids that can effectively accumulate while it is in
operation. If too much "sludge" or settled suspended solids accumulate
on the
plates, it may carry over into the wastewater outlet chamber
and end up being discharged to the environment. Proper clarifier design will
take the plate spacing into consideration and also allow for the removal and storage of
accumulated sludge from the clarifier to ensure that the
accumulated products do not effect the operation of the
clarifier.
-
Maintenance Practices
The ability of any clarifier to function properly depends
upon the timely performance of required service and maintenance.
Clarifiers must be monitored and maintained by
competent personnel who understand how the systems operate.
Clarifiers should be given the same close attention shown
to any other important piece of equipment. The operators, users,
and maintainers of the clarifier must be clear on who will
be responsible for monitoring, inspecting, maintaining, and
servicing the system. Frequent inspections should be made of the
system and all associated piping, valves, etc. to prevent
operational and mechanical failures or inefficiencies. Sludge
needs to be regularly removed from the clarifier to keep it operating properly. Additionally, leaks
from clarifiers can result in environmental pollution,
which can trigger costly investigative studies and cleanups.
Rigorous implementation of a clarifier inspection and maintenance
plan can prevent discharges from the clarifier that
may contaminate the environment.
-
Suitability of Inclined Plate
Clarifier System to Process
A clarifier designed and installed to meet a past
process requirement may no longer be suitable when process
requirements change and/or the original maintenance plan is no
longer followed. A clarifier that is put to a use for
which it was not originally designed may be damaged or may not
function properly, and could become an environmental liability.
For example, a clarifier designed to receive the
wastewater discharge from a small heavy metal precipitation
system will not be
able to properly treat larger wastewater volumes for removing
chrome from a tannery effluent. Process changes can also result in
changes to the physical/chemical makeup of the wastewater being
treated by a clarifier.
-
Contaminants Contained in the
Wastewater Stream
Metallic particles in the wastewater will settle into the sludge
at the bottom of the clarifier. Solvents or fuel
compounds may also be entrained in the clarifier's
sludge. This sludge could require management under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as a hazardous waste, if it
exhibits certain toxicity characteristics. Therefore, it is
important to prohibit the discharge of certain types of
potential contaminants into a clarifier, and to
regularly analyze sludge samples to determine toxicity prior to
disposal. General improvements in spill/drip
control and containment of hazardous materials and solvents will
also reduce the amount of contamination in clarifier
discharges.
|
STEP 1:
Identify Wastewater
Source
Buildings and areas, as well as ALL activities and processes
within the buildings and areas, that generate wastewater

|
|
STEP 2:
Institute Pollution Prevention
and Source Elimination / Reduction Procedures
Can the processes that generate
the wastewater be eliminated? Can the process be
converted to a dry process?

|
STEP 2-A:
Process altered or
eliminated, no further discharge
STOP
No Further Action Required
|
STEP 3:
Source Diversion
Can the process be moved to an
area that has existing clarification equipment in
place? Can the existing equipment handle the increased
flow? Is moving the process, diverting the flow,
economically feasible?

|
STEP 3-A:
Process relocated or discharge
diverted
STOP
No Further Action Required
|
STEP 4:
Wastewater Compliance
Evaluation
Identify permit limits on ALL pollutants
generated at the site. Characterize raw wastewater prior
to any treatment, if appropriate. Characterize treated
wastewater if existing treatment equipment is in place.

|
|
STEP 5:
Discharge & Pretreatment
Requirements
Does the raw wastewater meet permit limits
and environmental requirements? Does the treated
wastewater meet permit limits and environmental requirements?

|
STEP 5-A:
Discharge meets requirements,
STOP
No Further Action Required
|
STEP 6:
New Clarifier or
System Upgrades Required. Proceed to Inclined Plate Clarifier Design -
Flow Diagram
|
|
|
|
STEP 1:
Conduct a Wastewater
Characterization Study
The engineer / designer may conduct a wastewater characterization
study to establish clarifier or clarification system design
parameters.
The first step in a wastewater characterization
study is to conduct the "Clarifier
Settling Velocity" test. This bench test will
help determine the clarifier's "TARGET" effluent quality at a
specific particle settling rate. If possible, you should
conduct this test numerous times to allow for variances in your
overall process.
 |
STEP 2:
Determine the Type of
Clarifier or Clarification System Necessary for Your Process
Evaluate the results of the
characterization study and determine the category of suspended
solids to be
removed. Decide what type of clarifier or clarification
system to use.
NOTE:
Hydro-Flo ClariMax clarifiers are an excellent separation solution
for complex, evolving processes. The Hydro-Flo ClariMax
clarifiers
are designed to evolve with your growing, expanding process
requirements. These robust clarifiers can be retrofit with
a variety of plate packs, increasing the
efficiency of the separator as your process or discharge
requirements change. Surface drag skimmers for processes,
vapor tight lids, etc. are simple bolt on modifications.
 |
STEP 3:
Do You Have
an Existing Clarifier at Your Facility
If there is an existing clarifier on site, evaluate if it may be upgraded to accept the
total flow or partial flow from the proposed source to reduce
loadings.

|
STEP 3-A:
Will Upgrading the Existing
Clarifier Bring the Discharge into Compliance
Can the existing system be upgraded (by the
installation of alternate plate packs, etc.) or
adding additional treatment capabilities, etc.

|
STEP 4:
Review Concerns and
Requirements of the New Clarifier or Clarification System with the
Engineer / Designer
List all provisions that need to be
considered to ensure the new system will be accessible for
maintenance, will meet site specific area classifications (i.e.:
seismic and explosion proof area classifications, etc.) and
will meet all regulatory and effluent discharge requirements.

|
STEP 3-B:
Can the Existing Clarifier be
Used to Pre-treat the Wastewater Prior to the New Clarifier
Even if the existing clarifier is not
capable of handling the proposed load, it may be useable as a
form of pre-treatment or used in conjunction with the proposed
upgrades.

|
STEP 5:
Write the Specifications for
the New or Upgraded Clarifier or Clarification Systems
Write specifications for the new
clarifier, the clarifier upgrade or the new clarification system
required to meet all the above listed concerns and requirements.
|
STEP
3-C:
Incorporate existing clarifier into design |
STEP
3-D:
If determined that the existing clarifier is
no longer suitable for its current use or is unusable in the new
system, incorporate the closure of the existing clarifier into the
specifications |
STEP
3-E:
Design the upgrade of the existing clarifier |
|
Determining the hydraulic loading ratio required to meet your
effluent requirements (ppm, mg/l) is an important step in the design
and sizing of any clarification system. A small change in the
hydraulic loading ratio can result in a large change in the size
of the specified clarifier. For example look at the
following spreadsheets.
|
|
Input |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Process Flow Rate |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Desired Hydraulic Loading Ratio |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Desired Plate Spacing |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required PSA |
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available Models |
Cross Sectional Velocity
In Ft/Min |
Total Effective PSA |
Actual Hydraulic
Loading Ratio |
|
|
139 |
- |
10 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.02 |
559 |
0.18 |
|
|
139 |
- |
10 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.02 |
559 |
0.18 |
|
|
129 |
- |
8 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
0.87 |
512 |
0.20 |
|
|
129 |
- |
8 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.02 |
439 |
0.23 |
|
|
127 |
- |
6 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
0.68 |
479 |
0.21 |
|
|
139 |
- |
6 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
0.61 |
532 |
0.19 |
|
MODEL NOT AVAILABLE |
0 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
#DIV/0! |
0 |
#DIV/0! |
|
|
120 |
- |
4 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
0.51 |
399 |
0.25 |
| |
Required Cubic Feet of Media |
|
Overall Plate Length |
|
Number of Influent Troughs |
|
Sludge Thickening
or
Pyramid Hopper |
|
|
|
|
|
Input |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Process Flow Rate |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Desired Hydraulic Loading Ratio |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the Desired Plate Spacing |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required PSA |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Available Models |
Cross Sectional Velocity
In Ft/Min |
Total Effective PSA |
Actual Hydraulic
Loading Ratio |
|
|
104 |
- |
10 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.53 |
373 |
0.27 |
|
|
139 |
- |
10 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.02 |
559 |
0.18 |
|
|
86 |
- |
8 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.22 |
366 |
0.27 |
|
|
86 |
- |
8 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.53 |
293 |
0.34 |
|
|
81 |
- |
6 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.02 |
319 |
0.31 |
|
|
92 |
- |
6 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
1.02 |
319 |
0.31 |
|
|
74 |
- |
4 |
- |
1 |
- |
ST OR PB |
0.76 |
266 |
0.38 |
|
|
74 |
- |
4 |
- |
2 |
- |
ST OR PB |
0.76 |
266 |
0.38 |
| |
Required Cubic Feet of Media |
|
Overall Plate Length |
|
Number of Influent Troughs |
|
Sludge Thickening
or
Pyramid Hopper |
|
|
|
The only change in the above spreadsheets was the "Hydraulic Loading
Ratio". All other
variables remain the same.
On the first spreadsheet the "Hydraulic Loading Ratio" was
input at .25. On the second spreadsheet the "Hydraulic Loading
Ratio" was input at .40. You will note that the
model #'s (which represent the total cubic feet of media
required) changed from a high of 139 cubic feet to a low of 74 cubic feet. That
is a 46% change in the total size of the separator.
Both examples are suitable for 100 gallons per minute. Both
examples will remove the targeted suspended solid. The real world difference between
all the listed clarifiers is overall clarifier efficiency.
This example should reinforce the importance of accurately
conducting the "Test for Determination of Clarifier Hydraulic
Loading Ratio" and the "Clarifier
Settling Rate" studies. If you size a clarifier
without knowing the target "Hydraulic Loading Ratio", you will have
to greatly over size the clarifier, because erring on
the safe side, you will have to size the clarifier for maximum
efficiency.
The final step is to insert the data into the "clarifier sizing spreadsheet".
NOTE:
ALWAYS SPECIFY THE "SHORTEST" PLATE LENGTH
FEASIBLE FOR YOUR INSTALLATION.
This is VERY important.
All things being equal (projected surface area
and plate spacing), a clarifier with 4' long plates will generate
better results than a clarifier with 8' long plates.
A clarifier with 4' long plates (as
opposed to a clarifier with 8' long plates) will accumulate 1/2
the amount of sludge on the surface of the plates. Lower
accumulation of sludge per plate helps prevent sludge re-entrainment
and clarifier fouling.
Also, shorter plates will lower cross
sectional velocities and improve overall laminar flow conditions.
The trade off is that clarifiers with short
plate lengths take up more floor space. A clarifier with 8' long plates will take up half the floor space that a comparable
clarifier with 4' long plates.
If you go to ten different clarifier manufacturers and ask
them to size a clarifier for a specific application (even when giving
them a written specification), you will get ten different answers.
Everyone bases the efficiency of their clarifier on their clarifier's
projected surface area. But, other design variables are all
over the map. Plate spacing will vary from 3/4"
to 2", and more. The angles and configurations of the plates
are vastly different from manufacturer to manufacturer.
Overall clarifier volume, from the largest to the smallest designs,
can fluctuate as much as 150%, or more.
When comparing one manufacturer to another, it is best to compare
the volume of the separation chamber (or size of the plate pack) in
cubic feet verses the sell price. This ratio should give you
the clarifiers cost per cubic foot of plate pack. This is important
because the physical size of the clarifier is the greatest factor in
the cost, as well as the efficiency, of the device. The published
projected surface area
has a much smaller impact on the clarifier's overall cost and
performance.
NOTE:
DO NOT COMPARE CLARIFIERS
BASED SOLELY ON THE AMOUNT OF PROJECTED SURFACE AREA!
This is VERY important.
Many clarifier manufacturers use the smallest plate spacing
possible in their clarifiers. This allows them to post the
largest projected surface area numbers possible, giving the customer
the impression that they are purchasing the most efficient separator
available.
Unfortunately, using the smallest possible
plate spacing is not the answer. Care must be taken when
specifying plate spacing. If the plate spacing is too narrow,
the results will be excessively high cross sectional
velocities and unacceptably high Reynolds numbers, improper plate pack distribution
and short
circuiting issues, as well as sludge re-entrainment and high volumes
of floc carry over.
There are many clarifiers in the field
built with 8 foot long plates and 3/4" plate spacing that are only
capable of operating at 30% of the designed flow rate! There
are also many clarifier manufacturers who specify 1" plate spacing,
but in fact, they are actually less than that because they do not
account for the plate thickness in their calculations.
Make sure that, when you are talking
about plate spacing, you are talking about the distance between the
plates - not the distance from plate center to center. On
smaller applications, the difference does not amount to much, but on
large projects, the difference can be substantial.
Also, many manufacturers claim that their
clarifiers are 100% efficient. Current fluid dynamic studies
have shown that even the best designs are 85% efficient at best and
that some are even as low as 50% efficient. We rate our
clarifiers at a conservative 80% efficiency rating. Make sure
that you receive confirmation of the clarifier's total projected
surface area as well as the clarifier's "effective" surface area.
|
|